IRS Urges Taxpayers to Choose Tax Preparers Carefully to Protect Data (IR-2025-21)
The IRS reminded taxpayers to choose the right tax professional to help them avoid tax-related identity theft and financial harm. […]
Read MoreAn individual who had electronically filed a petiton to seek redermination of tax deficiency eleven seconds after midnight of the due date had his petition dismissed as untimely. The Tax Court’s electronic filing system (DAWSON) was held to be a filing location for the puposes of Code Sec. 7451, and this location was available at all times on the day the taxpayer’s petition was due.
The taxpayer alleged that he had encountered problems when electronically filing his petition and that those problems caused the petition to be untimely. The taxpayer had set up an account to electronically file the petition through DAWSON and had downloaded the necessary PDF forms to his Android mobile phone, but he was unable to fill out the forms on his phone. Subsequently, he was finally able to switch to his Windows computer shortly before midnight but was slowed down by having to send the filled out forms from his phone to his email to be downloaded to his computer. Moreover, the taxpayer had to refer to the instructions several times. However, DAWSON remained operational for other users at all relevant times. Since the petition was not received by the tax court until eleven seconds after midnight, it was not timely under Code Sec. 6213(a).
The taxpayer contended that DAWSON system errors prevented him from filing his petition at or before midnight and claimed protection under Code Sec. 7451. However, DAWSON, as a filing location, was not inaccessible or otherwise unavailable to the general public on the taxpayer’s last filing date. Code Sec. 7451 was inapplicable because the difficulties experienced by the taxpayer such as his inability to fill out PDF forms on his phone were irrelevant. The forms were completed separately and were not a part of DAWSON’s filing portal.
The Tax Court held that the mailbox rule was not applicable to electronic filing. Further, the doctrine of equitable tolling was not applicable in the taxpayer’s case because the filing deadline was jurisdictional under Code Sec. 6213. Congress has limited the Tax Court’s deficiency jurisdiction to only those cases in which a petition has been timely filed and the tax court has not been given the authority to extend the deadline in Code Sec. 6213 by equitable tolling.
The IRS reminded taxpayers to choose the right tax professional to help them avoid tax-related identity theft and financial harm. […]
Read MoreThe IRS provided six tips to help taxpayers file their 2024 tax returns more easily. Taxpayers should follow these steps […]
Read MoreThe IRS encouraged taxpayers to make essential preparations and be aware of significant changes that may affect their 2024 tax […]
Read MoreGuidance is provided for property and casualty insurers that write inland marine insurance and pay the State Fire Marshal Regulatory […]
Read MoreThe IRS released the optional standard mileage rates for 2025. Most taxpayers may use these rates to compute deductible costs […]
Read MoreThe IRS, in partnership with the Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats (CASST), has unveiled new initiatives for the 2025 […]
Read MoreThe IRS reminded disaster-area taxpayers that they have until February 3, 2025, to file their 2023 returns, in the entire […]
Read MoreThe IRS has announced plans to issue automatic payments to eligible individuals who failed to claim the Recovery Rebate Credit on their […]
Read More