Newsletters

Conservation Easement Extinguishment Proceeds Regulation Found Invalid

D.F. Hewitt, CA-11, 2022-1 ustc¶50,102

The IRS’s interpretation of Reg. §1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii), which disallows the subtraction of post-donation improvements to property on which a conservation easement exists in the event of a judicial extinguishment, was arbitrary and capricious because it violated the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). As a result, the Tax Court’s denial of a married couple’s carryforward charitable deduction for the donation of the charitable conservation easement was reversed and remanded.

Donation of the Easement

The couple donated the easement in 2012 and took a deduction on their 2012 income tax return. On their 2013 and 2014 income tax returns, the couple claimed a carryforward charitable deduction from the 2012 easement donation. The Tax Court denied the carryforward charitable deduction because the deed violated Reg. §1.170A-14(g)(6). The couple argued that the Commissioner’s interpretation of the rule was arbitrary and capricious and violated the procedural requirements of the APA.

APA’s Proposed Rulemaking Procedure

The APA sets forth three steps for proposed rulemaking. First, the general notice of proposed rulemaking is issued by an agency and is generally published in the Federal Register. Where notice is required, interested persons are permitted to submit written comments. “Significant comments” must be considered and responded to during the period for public comments. Third, in adopting the final rule, the agency must include a statement of the rule’s basis and purpose within the text.

Extinguishment Rule

During the rulemaking process, the couple argued that significant comments were made and that the Treasury Department did not respond to those comments and did not address the comments in the final rule’s basis and purpose statement, as it was required to do by the APA. The couple identified 13 comments on the extinguishment rule, with seven of those comments expressing various concerns about the regulation. In particular, the couple noted comments from the New York Landmarks Conservancy (NYLC), which recommended deleting the rule because “it contained pervasive problems of policy and practical applications.” Because the NYLC’s comments stated that the rule would block the purpose of the statute by deterring conservation easement donations, the comment was significant and required a response from the Treasury Department.

Reversing and remanding a Tax Court opinion, Dec. 61,701(M), T.C. Memo. 2020-89, 119 T.C.M. 1593.

Rates Used in Computing Special Use Value Issued, Rev. Rul. 2022-16

A listing of the average annual effective interest rates on new loans under the Farm Credit System has been issued […]

Read More
Rates Used in Computing Special Use Value Issued, Rev. Rul. 2022-16

IRS Unintentionally Releases Form 990-T Data

The Internal Revenue Service announced that it has unintentionally made certain data collected from Form 990-T available for bulk download […]

Read More
IRS Unintentionally Releases Form 990-T Data

IRS Clarifies Instructions for Form 8996, IRS Post-Release Changes to Tax Forms, Instructions, and Publications

The IRS has clarified that qualified opportunity zone businesses should not file Form 8996. Form 8996 is filed only by […]

Read More
IRS Clarifies Instructions for Form 8996, IRS Post-Release Changes to Tax Forms, Instructions, and Publications

List of Countries with U.S. Exchange of Information Agreements Updated, Rev. Proc. 2022-35

The IRS has supplemented the list of countries with which the U.S. has an agreement relating to the exchange of […]

Read More
List of Countries with U.S. Exchange of Information Agreements Updated, Rev. Proc. 2022-35

Tuition Debt Relief Will Not Be Taxable Income

The recently announced tuition debt relief program will not add to the tax burden of individuals who are able to […]

Read More
Tuition Debt Relief Will Not Be Taxable Income

IRS Updates Premium Tax Credit Table, Required Contribution Percentage, Rev. Proc. 2022-34

The IRS has updated the applicable percentage table used to calculate an individual’s premium tax credit and required contribution percentage […]

Read More
IRS Updates Premium Tax Credit Table, Required Contribution Percentage, Rev. Proc. 2022-34

Reproduction/Substitute Information Returns Requirements Issued, Rev. Proc. 2022-30

The IRS has provided the specifications for the private printing of red-ink substitutes for the 2022 revisions of information returns, […]

Read More
Reproduction/Substitute Information Returns Requirements Issued, Rev. Proc. 2022-30

IRS Advises Tax Professionals on Signs of Identity Theft, IR-2022-144

The IRS and Security Summit partners have urged tax professionals to be vigilant and look out for the signs of […]

Read More
IRS Advises Tax Professionals on Signs of Identity Theft, IR-2022-144

IRS Issues Statement on CP-14 Notices

The IRS was aware that some payments made for 2021 tax returns were incorrectly applied to joint taxpayer accounts. These […]

Read More
IRS Issues Statement on CP-14 Notices

IRS and Treasury Release Initial Information on Electric Vehicle Tax Credit Under Inflation Reduction Act

The Treasury Department and the IRS have published initial information on changes to the tax credit for electric vehicles strengthened […]

Read More
IRS and Treasury Release Initial Information on Electric Vehicle Tax Credit Under Inflation Reduction Act